President Obama’s Gay Policy Promises and Actions Recently
Wednesday, June 17th, 2009If you’re a gay democrat like me, you may be a little conflicted about the recent actions and/or inactions of Obama and his administration concerning LGBT rights. The LGBT community has been increasing the pressure as of late to start working on his promises to us. It began with Lieutenant Daniel Choi shining a light on Don’t Ask Don’t Tell (DADT) as he came out on national television which led to his dismissal. I expanded my focus from marriage equality and remembered the stunningly explicit discrimination that our federal government sponsors.
From there, Obama commemorated the 40th anniversary of the Stonewall Riots by declaring June “LGBT Pride Month.” Our community was pleased with the recognition but would not be appeased. The promises of this administration are in the forefront of our minds and I am painfully aware of the administration’s dodging of the issues. Despite the disappointments, I am prone to trust the judgment of Obama and trusted that he was aiming for the right timing and strategy to repeal DADT and the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and it was our job to make sure the promises were not forgotten.
Then, we were hit with the recent Department of Justice defense of DOMA. Not only did they defend DOMA, they used some inflammatory language including incest and child rape. They went further to say that DOMA is constitutional and even saves the country money. Why did the language go so far? Because one of the writers was W. Scott Simpson, a conservative Mormon who worked under Bush’s administration. The bigger question is: Why is Obama and his administration ok with this? It’s arguable on whether or not the DOJ had to defend existing law (DOMA) but there has been precedent of former presidents who have filed briefs opposing existing federal law as unconstitutional.
This is where Obama crossed the line with many of us gays including me. This is where I began to seriously question whether or not he really had our interests in mind. In response to the uproar, the DOJ spokesperson released the following statement.
As it generally does with existing statutes, the Justice Department is defending the law on the books in court. The president has said he wants to see a legislative repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act because it prevents LGBT couples from being granted equal rights and benefits. However, until Congress passes legislation repealing the law, the administration will continue to defend the statute when it is challenged in the justice system.
Though it was nice to hear that he remembered that he wants to see a repeal of DOMA, the damage was done. The uproar prompted a boycott of the LGBT Leadership Council’s DNC fundraiser by some rich and influential gays including David Mixner.
With acknowledgment that the timing had something to do with pissing off the gays, Obama pushed ahead his move to sign an executive order to extend same-sex partner benefits to federal employees. Yay right? Not quite. The benefits that same-sex partners would receive include long-term insurance, allow employees to use sick leave to take care of ailing partners, and would let partners of diplomats to use the medical facilities at foreign posts. Noticeably missing is healthcare benefits (which is what I think of when I hear “benefits”). DOMA (the very same DOMA Obama’s DOJ defended) prevents the extension of those benefits.
So where are we now? Well I can only speak for myself when I say that I am highly disappointed by Obama’s inaction when it comes to DADT, action when it comes to DOMA, and his baby steps when it comes to LGBT month and the extension of benefits. I am waiting and will be pushing for a significant step towards keeping his promise to us.











